Results
Trend analysis – In 2026, all 83 (100%) pheasant survey routes throughout the state were
completed during the spring survey period. The average number of pheasants recorded
during each 6-minute survey stop in 2026 was 0.73 pheasants/stop (SE = 0.05) and was 9.6%
lower than results from 2025 (0.81 pheasants/stop, SE = 0.05; Table 1). However, the statewide
average number of pheasants per stop in 2026 remained 31.5% higher than the 5-year
average of 0.56 pheasants/stop from 2021–2025 (95% CI = 0.53–0.59; Figure 2).
Discussion
The average number of pheasants detected per stop in 2026 was slightly less than survey results in 2025 (Table 1); however, the year-over-year decrease was statistically insignificant (P = 0.235) since there was less than a 10% change. While annual trend observations from survey data may be inferred, caution is advised against using such an approach given the potential for large annual fluctuations in pheasant populations. Making comparisons against the 5-year average does, however, provide a better gauge of the overall pheasant population
trend in Wisconsin. In 2026, the average number of pheasants per stop (0.73 ± 0.05 [SE]) was 31.5% higher than the 5-year average from 2021–2025 (0.56 pheasants/stop; Figure 2). Survey results in the 3 years (2021–2023) immediately following the COVID-19 pandemic were lower than the 5-year average; however, survey results since 2024 have indicated a substantial increase in the number of pheasants per stop in relation to the 5-year average. Good brood-rearing conditions during the fall of 2023 and 2024, coupled with generally dry and mild
winter weather conditions throughout the 2023–2024 (Mason and Vavrus 2024) and 2024–2025 season (Mason et al. 2025), likely contributed to statewide increases in the spring pheasant abundance in 2024 and 2025. Though the 2025–2026 winter season started out cold, warmer conditions returned in February, coupled with near-normal precipitation throughout the season resulting in a close to average winter throughout much of Wisconsin (Mason et al. 2026). Outside of below normal temperatures at the start of the winter season, winter-related
stress likely had minimal impact on pheasant populations. However, record-setting rains during the month of April (Mason et al. 2026), particularly in east-central and southeast Wisconsin, not only inhibited the abilities for surveyors to conduct surveys, but also likely influenced the presence (or lack thereof) of pheasants along impacted routes within those respective regions.











